Who Makes Paraquat?

Which Companies Are Responsible for Making Paraquat and Paying the Lawsuits?

When you or a loved one receives a Parkinson’s disease diagnosis after years of exposure to the toxic herbicide Paraquat, one of the first questions that comes to mind is, “Who is responsible for this?” The suffering is personal, but the cause is corporate. A devastating illness linked to a chemical product is not just a tragedy; it is a potential injustice that demands accountability. Thousands of lawsuits are now being filed across the country to hold the powerful corporations that manufacture and sell Paraquat responsible for the harm they have allegedly caused.

These lawsuits claim that a handful of multinational chemical giants knew about the neurotoxic risks of their product for years but put profits ahead of people’s safety. Understanding who these companies are and the allegations against them is the first step toward seeking justice. At Walch Law, we are dedicated to helping victims of corporate negligence identify the responsible parties and fight for the full compensation they deserve. Bottom line: we know how to win California Paraquat lawsuits for the most money possible. Call now to set up your obligation-free consultation with Robert and Gary Walch now.

The Major Companies Behind Paraquat

While Paraquat is sold under various brand names, the litigation primarily targets two major corporations that have dominated its manufacture and distribution for decades.

Syngenta: The Primary Manufacturer

Syngenta is a global agribusiness giant based in Switzerland. It is the primary manufacturer of Paraquat, which it sells under the brand name Gramoxone. As the main producer, Syngenta is at the center of the ongoing lawsuits. The company has manufactured and profited from the sale of Paraquat for over 60 years. Lawsuits allege that during this time, Syngenta was aware of the mounting scientific evidence linking its product to Parkinson’s disease but failed to warn the public and the workers who used it every day.

Chevron Chemical Company: A Key Distributor

Chevron, a name most people associate with oil and gas, has also played a critical role in the history of Paraquat in the United States. Through a historical agreement with a predecessor of Syngenta, Chevron was the exclusive distributor of Paraquat in the U.S. for many years. Even though it did not manufacture the chemical itself, Chevron is named as a defendant in many lawsuits because it was responsible for the product’s labeling, marketing, and sale within the country. The claims against Chevron are similar to those against Syngenta: that it knew about the risks and failed to provide adequate warnings to end-users.

Other Involved Entities

While Syngenta and Chevron are the main defendants, other smaller distributors or successor companies may also share liability depending on the specific product used and the time frame of exposure. An experienced California Paraquat attorney can investigate your work history to identify every company in the chain of distribution that may be held accountable for your injuries.

What Are the Allegations Against These Companies?

The lawsuits filed against Syngenta and Chevron are not just about a product causing harm. They are about a pattern of alleged deception and a conscious disregard for human life. The central claims in the Paraquat litigation include:

Failure to Warn: This is the core of the case. Lawsuits allege that the companies knew their product was neurotoxic and could cause Parkinson’s disease but failed to place any warning about this risk on the product’s label, thereby robbing applicators and farmworkers of the ability to make an informed decision about their health.
Hiding and Manipulating Scientific Evidence: Plaintiffs claim that the manufacturers have known about the dangers for decades, citing internal company studies and independent research. Instead of acting on this information, the companies allegedly worked to discredit unfavorable science and promote a false narrative of safety.
Designing a Defective Product: The lawsuits argue that Paraquat is unreasonably dangerous for its intended use and that safer, alternative herbicides were available.
Prioritizing Profits Over Safety: Ultimately, the claims assert that these corporations made a calculated business decision to continue selling a highly profitable chemical despite knowing it was causing an incurable brain disease in its users.

This alleged pattern of behavior is what opens the door not only for compensation for victims’ losses but also for punitive damages intended to punish the companies for their egregious conduct.

Proving Corporate Responsibility in Your Case

To hold these companies accountable, you and your legal team must build a strong case that proves two main points:

You were exposed to Paraquat. This can be established through evidence like a commercial applicator’s license, employment records from farms or landscaping companies, purchase records of the chemical, and witness testimony from co-workers or neighbors.
The exposure was a substantial factor in causing your Parkinson’s disease. This is established through your medical diagnosis and, crucially, through expert testimony from neurologists, toxicologists, and other scientists who can explain the causal link to a jury.

An experienced law firm takes on the entire burden of this investigation, allowing you to focus on your health and family.

What Compensation Can Victims Recover?

A successful lawsuit can provide critical financial resources to cover the immense costs associated with a Parkinson’s diagnosis. The goal is to secure a recovery that accounts for every aspect of your loss.

All Past and Future Medical Bills: From medications and doctor visits to potential surgeries and in-home care.
Lost Wages and Future Earning Capacity: Compensation for the income you have lost and will be unable to earn due to your illness.
Pain and Suffering: Financial recovery for the physical pain, emotional anguish, and loss of enjoyment of life that this devastating disease causes.
Punitive Damages: A monetary penalty designed to punish the manufacturers for their alleged cover-up and to deter other corporations from engaging in similar behavior.

How Walch Law Fights for Victims of Corporate Negligence

Taking on multi-billion-dollar chemical corporations is an intimidating prospect. You need a legal team with the resources, experience, and unwavering commitment to fight for your rights. At Walch Law, we believe in leveling the playing field and holding powerful companies accountable.

Free, In-Depth Case Evaluation: We will provide a confidential consultation to review your work history and medical records, giving you a clear and honest assessment of your claim.
Comprehensive Investigation: Our team immediately gets to work gathering the evidence needed to prove your exposure and link it to the defendants. This includes tracking down employment records, identifying the specific products used, and building a timeline of your exposure.
World-Class Expert Collaboration: We work with a network of leading neurologists, toxicologists, and epidemiologists who provide the powerful expert testimony required to prove your case in court.
No Fee Unless We Win: We handle all Paraquat cases on a contingency fee basis. This means you pay absolutely nothing unless and until we secure financial compensation for you and your family. We invest our own resources to fight for you.

Contact Us Today to Hold Them Accountable

You are not just a statistic in a corporate risk assessment. You are a person whose life has been forever changed, and you deserve justice. The time to file a claim is limited by law, so it is crucial to act quickly.

Contact the experienced Paraquat attorneys at Walch Law today for a free, no-obligation case review. Let us help you identify the responsible parties and begin the fight for the accountability and financial security your family deserves.